Dismissed

S.Asokan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Apr 2017CRL OP(MD)/3087/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed the withdrawal of a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash a criminal case, granting liberty to raise points in trial. The petitioners were directed to appear before the trial court and receive the final report. A direction was issued for the trial court to complete the trial within three months. The court specified severe consequences for dilatory t

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed with liberty to raise points before trial court; trial to be completed within three months.

S.Asokan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 11.04.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.3087 of 2017

¶7

and

¶8

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.2344 of 2017

¶9

1.S.Asokan

¶10

2.S.Venkaeswaran

¶11

: Petitioners/Accused

¶12

Nos.1 & 2

¶13

-Vs-

¶14

State rep. by, The Inspecter of Police, Athiramapttinam Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.159 of 2013)

¶15

.. Respondent/Complainant

¶16

P.Visavalingam, S/o Periyathambi, Village Administrative Officer, Sendakottai.

¶17

: Respondent/Defacto complainant

¶18

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash C.C.No. 572 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai in Crime No.159 of 2013 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Athiramapattinam Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Mani For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶20

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

When this Court was about to dismiss this petition on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the points before the trial Court.

¶23

Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points before the trial Court.

¶24

¶25

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that a

¶26

direction may be issued to the trial Court to complete the trial expeditiously.

¶27

Information called for from the trial Court reveals that

¶28

the petitioners had not even appeared once before the trial Court and had not even received the copies of the documents under Section 207 Cr.P.C. This application itself has been filed by obtaining certified copies of the charge sheet and the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and not on the strength of the copies furnished by the trial Court under Section 207 Cr.P.C. Hence, the petitioners are directed to first appear before the trial Court and receive the final report. Thereafter, the trial Court is directed to complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of framing of charges, provided the petitioners cooperate in the trial by cross-examining the witnesses on the same day of their examination in chief as held by the Honourable Supreme Court in Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, reported in 2015(1) MLJ 288(SC). If the petitioners adopt any dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to remand them to custody as per Section 309 Cr.P.C. and also as per the the decision laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in State of U.P. Vs. Sambhunath Singh reported in 2001(4) SCC 667. If the petitioners abscond during the trial, a fresh F.I.R. can be registered against them under Section 229(A) I.P.C.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶31

/True Copy/

¶32

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶33

¶34

The Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai.

¶35

The Inspector of Police, Athiramapttinam Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶36

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶37

Ssl/das

¶38

vb/skn/sar3/02.05.2017/2p/4c

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.3087 of 2017 11.04.2017

S.Asokan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Asokan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Salam Vs Abdul Rahman

Maria Arasu Vs the Inspector of Police

Maria Arasu Vs the Inspector of Police

Kr.Ramasamy, Vs M.Unnamalai

Kannan. Vs State Rep.by

Jeyaraman Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police