Sathiya Kumar @ Mohamed Shakil v. Farzana Begum
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.03.2017…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.03.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL.O.P.(MD)No.172 of 2017
1.Sathiya Kumar @ Mohamed Shakil Ahamed
Farzana Begum : Respondent
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records pertaining to the petition in M.C.No.165 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Trichy and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioners : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatesh
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Records)
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Family Court, Trichy.
SML
SVA/BS/20.03.2017/1P/2C
Order made in CRL.O.P.(MD) No.172 of 2017 13.03.2017
1.Sathiya Kumar @ Mohamed Shakil Ahamed - 2.Vallinayagam - 3.Ponnammal - 4.Sathiyakala - 5.Prema - 6.Sudalaimuthu - 7.Selvalakshmi - 8.Muthuraj
Farzana Begum
P.N.Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court