Balamurugan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.OP filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash proceedings in Cr.No.265/2016 on account of an amicable settlement and a joint compromise memo dated 02.02.2017.
What did the court decide?
The entire proceedings in Crime No.265 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent police are quashed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.03.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1540 of 2017
: Petitioner/Sole Accused
Balamurugan
-vs-
1.State Rep. by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Devakottai Taluk Police Station, Sivagangai District. ...1st Respondent/Complainant
2.Velmurugan ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in Crime No.265 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthusamy For Respondent No.1 : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Crl.side) For Respondent No.2 : Mr.C.Saravanan
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC should be allowed to quash the proceedings in view of an amicable settlement between the parties?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balamurugan
- respondent
State Rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Devakottai Taluk Police Station, Sivagangai District
- respondent
Velmurugan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court