Dismissed

A.Chelladurai v. the Secretary to Governmant

Madras HC6 Jun 2017CRL OP(MD)/13041/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction under Section 482 CrPC to register a case against a police officer and claim compensation. The respondent lawyer reported the complaint was closed earlier in 2015. The court closed the petition with liberty to work out remedies elsewhere.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition closed with liberty to petitioner to work out remedies in the manner known to law.

A.Chelladurai Vs the Secretary to Governmant — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 06.06.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.13041 of 2014

¶7

A.Chelladurai : Petitioner -Vs1. State rep. by, The Secretary to the Government, Home Department, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai. 3. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 5.Sivakaran : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondents, (a) directing the fourth respondent to register a case against the fifth respondent and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶8

(b) directing the respondents to pay adequate compensation to the petitioner's son Mr.Arun for the damages and for the human rights violations meted out on him by the fifth respondent police. (c) and pass any other order and direction as this Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Samy https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondents 1to4 : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶9

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

The petitioner has come up with the present petition seeking a direction to the fourth respondent to register a case against the fifth respondent and take appropriate action in accordance with law and to direct the respondents to pay adequate compensation to the petitioner's son Mr.Arun for the damages and for the human rights violations meted out on him by the fifth respondent police.

¶12

Mr.A.Balaiah, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Alwarkuruchi Police Station is present in Court today. On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police against the SubInspector of Police- Sivakaran and the complaint has been closed as early as on 12.01.2015. Recording the same, the Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies in the manner known to law.

¶13

Sd/-

¶14

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶15

/True Copy/

¶16

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶17

¶18

The Secretary to the Government, Home Department, St. George Fort, Chennai.

¶19

The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai.

¶20

The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶21

The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶22

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶23

+1cc to Mr.K.K.Samy, Advocate Sr.No.58780 SML VB/KKR/SAR4/14.06.2017/2P/7C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

Order made in CRL.O.P.(MD)No.13041 of 2014 Dated: 06.06.2017

A.Chelladurai v. the Secretary to Governmant

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Chelladurai v. the Secretary to Governmant

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeyaramu, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Adaikalam, Vs the Superintendent of Police

P.Sudalai, Vs the Superintendent of Police

K.Ayanraj Vs the Superintendent of Police

N.Nagarajan, Vs the State Rep. by

M.P.Chandran Vs the Superintendent of Police