Dismissed

Karthick, v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Madras HC28 Aug 2017CRL OP(MD)/11298/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench directed the petitioner to surrender within two weeks. Upon surrender, the trial court must consider the bail petition on merits after issuing notice to the de-facto complainant/victim under Section 15(A) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, citing recent amendments.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender within two weeks; bail to be considered on merits after notice to complainant under Section 15(A) of SC/ST Act.

Karthick, Vs the Deputy Superintendent of — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 28.08.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.11298 of 2017

¶7

Karthick : Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mannargudi,

¶10

Thiruvarur District.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Needamangalam Police Station, Thiruvarur District.

¶12

(Crime No.153 of 2017) : Respondents 1 & 2 /Complainants

¶13

3.Daramaraj : 3^rd Respondent/Defacto-complainant

¶14

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge (Protection of Civil Rights), Thanjavur, to accept the surrender of the petitioner and to consider the bail application to be filed by the petitioner on the same day in Crime No.153 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.R.Sivasubramanian

¶16

For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate(Crl.Side).

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

In view of the amendments made in the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, this Court is of the view that the usual directions that were issued by this Court cannot be issued routinely in all cases. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial Court within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such surrender, the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge (Protection of Civil Rights), Thanjavur, is directed to consider the bail petition of the petitioner in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ connection with Crime No.153 of 2017, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the de-facto complainant/victim, under Section 15 (A) of the SC/ST Act.

¶19

¶20

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(RTI)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

1.The I Additional District and Sessions Judge

¶27

(Protection of Civil Rights), Thanjavur.

¶28

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mannargudi,

¶29

Thiruvarur District.

¶30

3.The Inspector of Police, Needamangalam Police Station, Thiruvarur District.

¶31

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶32

+1cc to M/S.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate SR.No. 74838

¶33

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.11298 of 2017

¶34

28.08.2017

¶35

das/pmu

¶36

JM/MR KKR/SAR 2/31.08.2017/2P/6C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Karthick, v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karthick, v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sirajudeen (38/17) Vs Inspector of Police

V.Subramanian, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ram Ganesh Vs the Inspector of Police

Karunakaran, M/a 49 Years Vs J.Nithyanandan

Sebastian Vs Nirmala

S. Natarajan Vs M. Dhanalakshmi