Dismissed

Sri Sairam Educational and v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC19 Apr 2017CRL OP(MD)/1007/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking police protection for a school trust. The Court denied the prayer because pending civil litigation regarding the same parties would be impinged upon by granting police protection under the CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition closed. Liberty granted to petitioner to work out remedies in the manner known to law.

Sri Sairam Educational and Vs the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.04.2017

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL.O.P.(MD)No.1007 of 2017

¶4

Sri Sairam Educational and Charitable Trust Represented by its Managing Director Viswanathan (M/48) S/o Ramasamy, No.9B, R.V. Nagar I Street, Orathanadu, Thanjavur District. : Petitioner

¶5

-Vs-

¶6

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

¶7

2.The Inspector of Police, Orathanadu Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶8

3.M.Panneer Selvam, Managing trustee, Sri Sairam Educational of Charitable Trust, Sri Srinivasa Metriculation Higher Secondary School, Orathnadu, Thanjavur. [R-3 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 24.03.2017, made in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.2073 of 2017]

¶9

: Respondents

¶10

PRAYER : Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondents police to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner and the school conducted by the petitioner trust namely Sri Srinivasa Matriculation Higher Secondary School in Orathanadu Town based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 04.01.2017.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondent No.1&2 : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Crl.side) For Respondent No.3 : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan for Mr.P.Krishnan

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

In view of the pendency of civil litigation between the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner and the opposite parties, an order giving police protection as prayed for cannot be granted under Section 482 of

¶14

the Code of Criminal procedure, as that would impinge upon the civil rights of parties.

¶15

In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies in the manner known to law.

¶16

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶17

/True Copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

¶21

The Inspector of Police, Orathanadu Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶22

The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶24

+1 cc to Mr.P.Krishnan, Advocate, SR.No.52894

¶25

+1 cc to Mr.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate, SR.No. 52859

¶26

Order made in CRL.O.P.(MD)No.1007 of 2017 Dated:19.04.2017

¶27

SML/MR

¶28

MKV-SKN/2.5.2017/2P-6C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sri Sairam Educational and v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Sairam Educational and v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.R.S.Subburaj Vijairam Vs Ashok Dal and Oil Mill Company

D.G.Leo Pristly @ Leo Christly Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthukrishnan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Ramasamy Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Amirthalingam Chettiar Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Simpson, Vs the Inspector of Police