Allowed

Immanuel, Aged 42 Years, v. State Rep. by Its

Madras HC8 Jun 2017CRL OP/8443/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge disposed of a criminal original petition filed by Immanuel. The court transferred a pending complaint from the Central Crime Branch to the Economic Offences Wing and directed the latter to register the complaint and investigate the alleged offenses against NBH Dairies & Allied Limited under court supervision.

What did the court decide?

Transferred the complaint from the second respondent to the third respondent; directed the third respondent to register the complaint and investigate under supervision.

Immanuel, Aged 42 Years, Vs State Rep. by Its — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.8443 of 2017

¶6

Immanuel ... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1. State rep.by its The Commissioner of Police, EVK Sampath Salai, Vepery, Periamet, Chennai-600 007. 2. Central Crime Branch, Office of the Commissioner of Police, EVK Sampath Salai, Vepery, Periamet, Chennai-600 007. 3. Economic Offences Wing, SIDCO, Old Corporate Building, First Floor, Garment Complex-II, Thiru Vi.Ka, Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. ... Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 1^st respondent to transfer the complaint and its file in C.No.5404 of 2016 on the file of the second respondent to the file of the third respondent office and further direct the third respondent to register the complaint against the accused HBN Dairies & Allied Limited, its promoters, directors and its managers/persons in-charge of the business and its schemes and investigate the same under the supervision of this Court.

¶10

The petitioner seeks to transfer the complaint filed by him in C.No.5404 of 2016 from the file of the second respondent to the file of the third respondent office, since the issue connected to the present complaint is inquired into by the third respondent.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has no serious objection for transferring the said complaint.

¶13

3.Hence, the complaint of the petitioner in C.No.5404 of 2016 pending on the file of the second respondent is transferred to the file of the third respondent. The third respondent, viz. Economic Offences Wing, Chennai is directed to act upon the said complaint in accordance with law.

¶14

4.The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of
accordingly.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
KM
To
1. The Commissioner of Police,
EVK Sampath Salai,
Vepery, Periamet,
Chennai-600 007.
2. Central Crime Branch,
Office of the Commissioner of Police,
EVK Sampath Salai,
Vepery, Periamet,
Chennai-600 007.
3. Economic Offences Wing,
SIDCO, Old Corporate Building,
First Floor, Garment Complex-II,
Thiru Vi.Ka, Industrial Estate,
Guindy, Chennai-600 032.
4. The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Chennai-600 104.
+1cc to Mr.S.Ashok Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.40908

¶15

Crl.O.P.No.8443 of 2017

¶16

NR I(CO) CA(20/06/2017)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Immanuel, Aged 42 Years, v. State Rep. by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Immanuel, Aged 42 Years, v. State Rep. by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajakumari, 44 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police,.

M/S.Suryadev Alloys and Vs M/S.Karismaa Foundations P Led

Devendaran, Aged 41 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Sekar (Aged About 38 Years) Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Arumugam, Aged 46 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Sundharrajan @ Murgan Vs the Inspector of Police