Allowed

K.Alamelu, F/a 65 Yrs, v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC21 Apr 2017CRL OP/8058/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed an O.P. under Section 482 CrPC seeking police protection. The court reviewed the matter after hearing counsel and directed the respondents to provide protection based on the petitioner's dated representation of 15.04.2017, subsequently disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to render necessary police protection to the petitioner based on representation dated 15.04.2017.

K.Alamelu, F/a 65 Yrs, Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 21.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.8058 of 2017

¶6

K.Alamelu .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City,
Vepery, Chennai 600 003.
2. The Joint Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City,
Sub Urban, Chennai.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City, Adyar,
Chennai 600 020.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City, Guindy, Chennai.
5. The Inspector of Police,
J-7, Velacherry Police Station,
Chennai. .. Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondents to render necessary police protection to the petitioner.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.J.C.Durairaj
For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz, GA (Crl.Side)
ORDER

¶10

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, praying to direct the respondents to render necessary police protection to the petitioner.

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

The petitioner was granted ad interim injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property by an order in I.A.No.4522 of 2014 in O.S.No.1596 of 2014 on the file of I Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. The petitioner has made a representation to the respondent-police on 15.04.2017 seeking police protection.

¶14

In this circumstances, there shall be a direction to the respondents to act on the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2017 by providing police protection.

¶15

With this direction, the petition is disposed of.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dpq
To
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City,
Vepery, Chennai 600 003.
2. The Joint Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City,
Sub Urban, Chennai.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City, Adyar,
Chennai 600 020.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City, Guindy, Chennai.
5. The Inspector of Police,
J-7, Velacherry Police Station,
Chennai.
6. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.J.C.Durairaj, Advocate, S.R.No.24281
Crl.O.P.No.8058 of 2017
pvs(co)
rmp(05/05/17)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Alamelu, F/a 65 Yrs, v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Alamelu, F/a 65 Yrs, v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Rajamani, Vs The Inspector of Police

Iyyammal Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

Vinoth Kumar, Vs Inspector of Police

S.Haridoss, Aged 42 Years, Vs the City Commissioner of

Prabhu @ Bharath Kumar, Vs State Rep. by

S.Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police