Disposed

SENTHILKUMAR,33 Yrs, v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC21 Apr 2017CRL OP/7926/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought transfer of investigation under Section 482 CrPC. The Court directed the third respondent to complete the investigation within four months, monitored by the first respondent, and filed a final report within the same period before disposing the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete investigation within four months monitored by Super, and file final report within four months.

SENTHILKUMAR,33 Yrs, Vs the Superintendent of Police — Madras HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 21.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7926 of 2017

¶6

Senthilkumar
2. Vijayalakshmi .. Petitioners
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
Ariyalur District,
Ariyalur
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Ariyalur
Ariyalur District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Jayankondam Police Station,
Ariyalur District
Crime No.531 of 2016 .. Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to transfer the Investigation in Crime No.531 of 2016 pending on the file of the third respondent to any other investigation agency by appreciating the above stated facts and circumstances.

¶8

For Petitioners: Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, GA (Crl.Side)

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, praying to transfer the Investigation in Crime No.531 of 2016 pending on the file of the third respondent to any other investigation agency by appreciating the above stated facts and circumstances..

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

¶12

Petitioner seeking to transfer the investigation in Crime No.531 of 2016 pending on the file of the third respondent to

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

any other investigation agency. Taking note of the contention of the petitioner that investigation has not been completed in Crime No.531 of 2016 there shall be a direction to the third respondent to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Investigation shall be monitored by the first respondent.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court feels it appropriate to direct the respondent to file final report in Crime No.531/2016 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶16

Accordingly, this criminal original petition is disposed
of.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dpq
To
1. The Superintendent of Police
Ariyalur District,
Ariyalur
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Ariyalur
Ariyalur District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Jayankondam Police Station,
Ariyalur District
4.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.Guruprasad, Advocate, S.R.No.24413
Crl.O.P.No.7926 of 2017
PA(CO)
RS(05/05/2017)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

SENTHILKUMAR,33 Yrs, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

SENTHILKUMAR,33 Yrs, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Rajamani, Vs The Inspector of Police

Iyyammal Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

Vinoth Kumar, Vs Inspector of Police

S.Haridoss, Aged 42 Years, Vs the City Commissioner of

Prabhu @ Bharath Kumar, Vs State Rep. by

S.Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police