Allowed

Deepak Bhalotia v. the Asst.Registrar of

Madras HC26 Apr 2017CRL OP/7597/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash economic offence complaints against petitioners alleged to be directors. The court held that the petitioners had resigned before the alleged dates of the offences and the orders were accordingly quashed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original petitions allowed and proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos. 186, 187, 188 & 185 of 2009 quashed.

Deepak Bhalotia Vs the Asst.Registrar of — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 26.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

¶5

Crl.OP.Nos.7597 to 7600 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2012

¶6

Deepak Bhalotia 2. Brajesh Sharma ...Petitioners (in All Crl.O.Ps.) Vs The Assistant Registrar of Companies, Shastri Bhavan, 26 Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006. ....Respondent (in All Crl.O.Ps.) The Criminal Original petitions are filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C., to quash the complaint in E.O.C.C.Nos.186, 187, 188 & 185 of 2009 respectively on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Economic Offences-I, Egmore, Chennai. For Petitioners : Mr.Harshad P.Goklaney, For Respondent :Dr.D.Siman CGSC. --O R D E R

¶7

The accusation in E.O.C.C.No.186 of 2009 is that the first accused-Company failed to file the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account placed in the Annual General Meeting within 30 days of the date thereof i.e. on or before 30.10.2006.

¶8

2.The accusation in E.O.C.C.No.187 of 2009 is that the first accused-Company failed to file the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account placed in the Annual General Meeting within 60 days of the date thereof i.e. on or before 29.11.2007.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

3.The accusation in E.O.C.C.No.188 of 2009 is that the first accused-Company failed to file the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account placed in the Annual General Meeting within 30 days of the date thereof i.e. on or before 30.10.2007.

¶11

4.The accusation in E.O.C.C.No.185 of 2009 is that the first accused-Company failed to file the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account placed in the Annual General Meeting within 60 days of the date thereof i.e. on or before 29.11.2006.

¶12

5.Learned Counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on Form-32 filed by the petitioners with the Registrar of Companies, which informs the position that the first petitioner had resigned [from the Directorship of the Company] on 27.01.2006 and second petitioner on 04.08.2005.

¶13

Therefore, it is clear that as on the date of Commission of offence, the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, informing them to be Directors of the Company were not so.

¶14

The Criminal Original Petitions stand allowed and the proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.186, 187, 188 & 185 of 2009 respectively on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Economic Offences-I, Egmore, Chennai are hereby quashed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

¶15

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶16

//True Copy//

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶18

kmi

¶19

¶20

1.The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Economic Offence-I Egmore, Chennai

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Assistant Registrar of Companies, Shastri Bhavan,

¶23

26 Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006.

¶24

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras-104.

¶25

+8 ccs to M/s.Harshad P.Goklaney Advocate sr 25592

¶26

Crl. O.P.Nos.7597 to 7600 of
2012
nrl(co)
aa21/06/2017

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Deepak Bhalotia v. the Asst.Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Bhalotia v. the Asst.Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan @ Soundara Rajan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Sheela@ Amsa Vs State Rep by

Jayakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Babu Vs State Rep. by

Ravi Vs Mani Megalai

Marayal Vs the Inspector of Police