Disposed

Brinda Devi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Jan 2017CRL OP/32208/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge in the Madras High Court, noting that the underlying criminal cases (120-123 of 2013) were already investigated, chargesheet filed, and ended in acquittal, closed the three Criminal Original Petitions filed to quash the proceedings as nothing survived for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petitions Nos. 32208 to 32210 of 2013 and connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Brinda Devi Vs the Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 19.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

Crl.O.P. Nos.32208 to 32210 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2013

¶6

Brinda Devi .. Petitioner
[in Crl.O.P.No.32208/2013]
1.Brinda Devi
2.Kannammal
3.Ramasamy .. Petitioners
[in Crl.O.P.No.32209/2013]
1.Brinda Devi
2.Sivakumar
3.Nagesh Kumar
4.Kannammal
5.Ramasamy .. Petitioners
[in Crl.O.P.No.32210/2013]
versus
1.State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Pollachi Town East Police Station,
Coimbatore District.
2.Meena .. Respondents
[in Crl.O.P.No.32208/2013]
1.State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Pollachi Town East Police Station,
Coimbatore District.
2.S.Kesavan .. Respondents
[in Crl.O.P.No.32209/2013]
1.State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Pollachi Town East Police Station,
Coimbatore District.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

2.T.Annamalaiyan .. Respondents [in Crl.O.P.No.32210/2013]

¶9

COMMON PRAYER : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in Crime Nos.120,122 123 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent.

¶10

For Respondent No.1 : Mr.C.Emalias [in all Crl.O.Ps.] Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

For Respondent No.2 : Mr.R.Krishnaprasad [in all Crl.O.Ps.] for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates

¶12

The petitioners have filed these Criminal Original Petitions to quash the proceedings in Crime Nos.120 to 123 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent.

¶13

Today, when these matters were taken up for consideration, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that in the cases in Crime Nos.120 to 123 of 2013, after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pollachi and the same was taken on file. Subsequently, after trial, the petitioners were also acquitted from the charges by order dated 10.09.2013.

¶14

Since the charge sheet has already been filed in Crime Nos.120 to 123 of 2013 and the cases ended in acquittal, nothing survives for adjudication in these matters. Hence, recording the submission so made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, these Criminal Original Petitions are closed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

¶15

True Copy

¶16

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶17

sri

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

1.The Inspector of Police, Government of Tamilnadu, Pollachi Town East Police Station, Coimbatore District.

¶21

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶22

+1 cc to M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates sr 3924

¶23

Crl.O.P. Nos.32208 to 32210 of 2013
kj(co)
aa03/02/2017

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Brinda Devi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brinda Devi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramasamy, Age 60 Years, Vs the State Rep. by the

S.S.Sundaram, Age 33 Years, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Abdullah, Vs the Inspector of Police

Semalaiyappan Vs Palanichamy

D.Anitha, Vs Jamina