S.Meena v. E.Umashankar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed three Criminal Original Petitions as withdrawn, noting the petitioner's leave sought and endorsed by the counsel, and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :21.03.2017 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
Crl.O.P.Nos.29295, 29296 and 29299 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1,1,1 of 2010
S.Meena .. Petitioner in All Crl.O.Ps Vs E.Umashankar .. Respondent in Crl.O.P.No.29295 of 2010 N.Selvaraj .. Respondent in Crl.O.P.No.29296 of 2010 C.Devaraj .. Respondent in Crl.O.P.No.29299 of 2010 Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.29295 of 2010: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.525 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet and quash the complaint. Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.29296 of 2010: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.527 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet and quash the complaint.
Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.29299 of 2010: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.528 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet and quash the complaint.
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Meena
- respondent
E.Umashankar
- respondent
N.Selvaraj
- respondent
C.Devaraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court