Allowed

M.Udayakumar, M/32YRS, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Jun 2017CRL OP/2522/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the Court directed the Judicial Magistrate to expedite trial proceedings of C.C.No.352 of 2015 and dispose of it within six months to protect the aged petitioners. The Court further ordered the aged petitioners to appear when required.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Judicial Magistrate, Alandur, to dispose of C.C.No.352 of 2015 within six months and ordered aged petitioners 2 and 3 to appear as required.

M.Udayakumar, M/32YRS, Vs the Inspector of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.2522 of 2017

¶6

M.Udayakumar
2. P.Muthaiyan
3. K.Devaki .. Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3
Vs
1. The Inspector of Police,
J-10, Chemmancheri Police Station,
Kancheepuram District.
2. Sheeba Ramasamy .. Respondents/Defacto complainant
Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure
Code, to direct the Judicial Magistrate, Alandur to expedite the
trial proceedings in C.C.No.352 of 2015 on his file and dispose
the same in accordance with law.
For Petitioners : Mr.G.V.Sridharan
For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias,
Additional Public Prosecutor for R1
O R D E R

¶7

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur to expedite the trial proceedings in C.C.No.352 of 2015 pending on his file and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

¶8

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that since the petitioners 2 and 3 are the aged parents of the first petitioner, a direction may be given to the Trial Court to dispose of the case in C.C.No.352 of 2015 within a stipulated time frame.

¶9

3.Mr.C.Emalias, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, takes notice for the first respondent.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

4.Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to direct the Judicial Magistrate, Alandur, Chennai to dispose of the case in C.C.No.352 of 2015 as expeditiously as possible, after affording due opportunity to the concerned parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, it is ordered that the petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the Trial Court, as and when required.

¶12

5.The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶13

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
KM
To
1. The Inspector of Police,
J-10, Chemmancheri Police Station,
Kancheepuram District.
2.The Judicial Magistrate, Alandur.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Chennai-600 104.
+1cc to Mr.G.V.Sridharan, Advocate SR.No.43872

¶14

Crl.O.P.No.2522 of 2017 SR(CO) GN(06/07/2017)

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Udayakumar, M/32YRS, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Udayakumar, M/32YRS, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.M. Chandrasekhara Reddy, Vs the Commissioner of Police

B.Jagan, Aged 27 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Radhakrishnan, Aged 59 Years Vs State Rep. by Its

N.Benjamin Franklin Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

B. Ramaraja, Vs the Station House Officer

Syngenta India Ltd., Vs the State of Tamil Nadu