Murugesan v. Marayammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the matter between the parties had already been settled.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.03.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDHARAN
Crl.O.P.No.10070 of 2010
and
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2010
1.Murugesan
2.Vasanthi
3.P.Thanuja
4.Krishnan
... Petitioners/Accused
Vs
Marayammal
... Respondent/Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of
Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to the criminal
complaint in C.C.No.298 of 2009, on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate No.I, Gobichettipalayam, quash the same by allowing
this Criminal Original Petition.
For Petitioners : M/s.N.Manokaran
For Respondent : Mr.A.Tamilvanan
ORDER
It is represented by both the learned counsel appearing on either side, the matter was already settled between the parties. Hence, the prayer in the petition has become infructuous and therefore, nothing survives in the petition.
2.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murugesan
- petitioner
Vasanthi
- petitioner
P. Thanuja
- petitioner
Krishnan
- respondent
Marayammal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court