Partly allowed

Narayanaperumal @ Aathi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Nov 2017CRL MP(MD)/9910/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions imposed in a previous order alleging offences punishable under various sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Indian Penal Code. The court modified the condition to require the petitioner to appear before police twice weekly.

What did the court decide?

Condition modified to appear before police twice a week on Mondays and Fridays at 10.30 a.m.

Narayanaperumal @ Aathi Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Third day of November Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.9910 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.11170 of 2017

¶6

NARAYANAPERUMAL @ AATHI ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER

¶7

Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIDAIKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 199 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.11170/2017 dated 04/09/2017.

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN Government Advocate(Crl.Side)on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶10

The Petitioner filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 302, 120(b) of I.P.C, in Crime No.199 of 2017.

¶11

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶12

3.The Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is regularly https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.

¶13

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, twice in a week i.e., on every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m, until further orders.

¶14

/ TRUE COPY /

¶15

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶16

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶17

Madurai - 625 023.

¶18

¶19

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,AMBASAMUTHIRAM.

¶20

2 -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶21

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIDAIKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶22

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH Court,MADURAI.

¶23

+1. C.C. to M/S.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.33834

¶24

MV:RR:SAR2:07/11/2017/2P/6C

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Narayanaperumal @ Aathi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narayanaperumal @ Aathi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundarammal, Vs the Inspector of Police

Govindan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Uma Vs the Inspector of Police

Sathiya Chitrakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Narenthiran Vs P.Vasu

Rani Rajamanickam Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police