Allowed

T.Mahadevi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC26 Oct 2017CRL MP(MD)/9562/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court relaxed the conditions imposed on petitioners in a prior bail order relating to offences under IPC, Dowry Prohibition Act, and TN Prohibition of Harassment Act, noting their regular compliance with requirements.

What did the court decide?

The conditions imposed upon the petitioners were relaxed; they shall appear before the concerned Court as and when required on receipt of summons.

T.Mahadevi Vs the Inspector of Police — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Twenty Sixth day of October Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.9562 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.10350 of 2017

¶6

1 T.MAHADEVI

¶7

2 SELVARAJ 3 SENTHIL ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THENI, THENI DISTRICT

¶10

(CRIME NO.15 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioners in Crl.M.P.(MD). No.7917 of 2017 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 10350 of 2017 dated 05.09.2017

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

The Petitioners filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 406, 294(b), 506 (i) of I.P.C.,Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of women Act, in Crime No.15 of 2017.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶16

3.The Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioners are regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.

¶17

4.Considering the above said facts, the condition is relaxed and the petitioners shall appear before the concerned Court as and when required on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶18

sd/26/10/2017

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

DAS/RMI TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI

¶21

2 DO THROGUH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT

¶22

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THENI, THENI DISTRICT

¶23

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶24

+1. C.C. to M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.33284

¶25

GJM/PM/PN/SAR-3-31.10.2017-2P-6C

¶26

ORDER

¶27

¶28

CRL MP(MD) No.9562 of 2017

¶29

¶30

CRL OP(MD) No.10350 of 2017

¶31

Date :26/10/2017

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Mahadevi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Mahadevi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Srinivasan Vs the Inspector of Police

C. Rabeek Raja @ Raja Bai Vs the Superintendent of Police

Bharathirajan Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Sanmugavel Vs the Inspector of Police

Shahul Hameed Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Ambica Vs the Deputy Superintendent of