Allowed

Vijay v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC3 Jul 2017CRL MP(MD)/5510/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court bench allowed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to restore a previously dismissed Criminal Original Petition. The petitioner was seeking police protection based on an earlier representation. The court accepted the affidavit reasons and directed the restoration of the file.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of Criminal Original Petition No.5704 of 2017 to the file.

Vijay Vs the Superintendent of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Third day of July Two Thousand and Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.S.SUNDAR

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.5510 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.5704 of 2017

¶6

1 VIJAY S/O.KARUPPAIAH,

¶7

ENATHIPATTI, KOTHAMANGALAM POST, KARAIKUDI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶8

2 NIVETHA W/O.VIJAY,

¶9

ENATHIPATTI, KOTHAMANGALAM POST,

¶10

KARAIKUDI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS

¶11

¶12

1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, SIVAGANGAI TOWN&DISTRICT

¶13

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHETTINAD POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT S

¶14

PRAYER IN CRL MP(MD)5510 /2017:

¶15

Petition filed under section 482 of Crl.p.c to restore the Criminal Original Petition in Crl.O.P(MD).No.5704/2017 dated 12/05/2017 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶16

Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 5704/ 2017 :

¶17

Petition filed under section 482 of Crl.p.c to direct the 2nd respondent for police protection to the petitioners on the representation dated 03/05/2017 .

¶18

Order : This petition coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the petition and affidavit and material papers of this petition, and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.V.SELVA, Advocate for the petitioner, and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on behalf of state,this court made the following order:-

¶19

This petition has been filed to restore the above Criminal Original Petition which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 12.05.2017.

¶20

2.Heare the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents Police and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶21

3.I have gone through the averments found in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and convinced with the reasons stated therein.

¶22

4.In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the Crl.O.P(MD) No.5704 of 2017 which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 12.05.2017 is restored to file.

¶23

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S.)

¶24

¶25

1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, SIVAGANGAI TOWN&DISTRICT

¶26

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHETTINAD POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶27

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. COPY TO: THE SECTION OFFICER, CRIMINAL SECTION , MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

ORDER DATED :03/07/2017 RESTORED

¶29

CRL MP(MD) No.5510 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.5704 of 2017 JS/JC/SAR1:10.07.2017:2P-5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vijay v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Suganniya Vs the District Collector

The Secretary Vs the Director of School

V.Vaiyapuri, S/O.Veerappan Vs the Secretary to Government

Jamal Mohamed Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Dhanapal Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Seenivasan Vs the Inspector of Police