Disposed

Grinivasaprasad v. T.D. Sanjay

Madras HC19 Jun 2017CRL MP(MD)/5146/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Madurai Bench, addressed a bail-related petition seeking dispensation with personal appearance pending a quash petition. The Court directed the petitioner to appear before the trial court within two weeks, upon which he would be released on bail under Section 436 CrPC. Future appearances were dispensed with upon an undertaking. The order was thin but substantive regarding bail cond

What did the court decide?

Directed to appear before Trial Court within two weeks for release on bail under Section 436 CrPC; thereafter, presence dispensed with subject to undertaking.

Grinivasaprasad Vs T.D. Sanjay — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Nineteenth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.5146 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.7515 of 2017

¶6

GRINIVASAPRASAD ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶7

T.D. SANJAY ... RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.95/2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel pending disposal of the above quash petition.

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.RAMASAMY, Advocate for the petitioner, while admitting the Crl.OP., the court made the following order:-

¶10

The petitioner is directed to appear before the Trial Court, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such appearance, he shall be released on bail under Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the same day on he executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. Thereafter, the presence of the petitioner before the Trial Court shall be dispensed with after getting an undertaking from him that in the event of Crl.O.P. (MD)No.7515 of 2017 being dismissed by this Court, he shall voluntarily appear before the Trial Court without waiting for further summons.

¶11

/ TRUE COPY /

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶14

¶15

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIEL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶16

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

¶17

+1. C.C. to M/S.S.RAMASAMY Advocate SR.No.24508

¶18

sml CSL/RR-BS/SAR-II/23.06.2017: 2P/4C ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5146 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.7515 of 2017 Date :19/06/2017

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Grinivasaprasad v. T.D. Sanjay

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Grinivasaprasad v. T.D. Sanjay

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Rex, S/O.Susaiah Vs the Deputy Director

N.Kalyana Sundaram Vs Ramraj

K.Santhosh@Bhavgavathiperumal Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Shankar Nagar Property Vs M/S.Arulselvi Finance

M/S.Eurokem Laboratories Pvt. Vs the Drugs Inspector

Nataraja Rediyar, Vs K.Muthu