Partly allowed

Kevin, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Jun 2017CRL MP(MD)/5031/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail matter where the petitioner was already under conditional release, this court relaxed the existing conditions upon hearing counsel. The petitioner must now appear before the police only as required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the earlier conditions of bail; petitioner shall appear before respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

Kevin, Vs the Inspector of Police — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Sixteenth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.5031 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.3497 of 2017

¶6

KEVIN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KULASEKARAPATTINAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶9

CRIME NO.34 OF 2017. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions imposed against him in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3497 of 2017, dated 03.04.2017 and thus render justice.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.J.KARTHICK, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/Police.

¶13

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/Police submitted that the petitioner is complying with the conditions imposed by this Court regularly.

¶14

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the earlier condition is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police, as and when required for interrogation. This petition is ordered accordingly.

sd/-

16/06/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶19

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

¶21

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THIRUCHENDUR.

¶22

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN.

¶23

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶24

KULASEKARAPATTINAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶25

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

+1. C.C. to M/S.R.J.KARTHICK Advocate SR.No.24346 GK CSL/KK/SAR-IV/19.06.2017 : 2P/6C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kevin, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kevin, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamaraj, Vs Manickam

Rajan, Vs Mohamad Ibrahim

Pandidurai Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Thangam Vs P.Nallamuthu

K.Palanichamy Vs K.Mohammed Nizar

Periyakaruppan, Vs the Inspector of Police