Partly allowed

Palpandi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Mar 2017CRL MP(MD)/2268/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail matter, the Madras High Court relaxed a condition previously imposed on the petitioner allowing him to report to police as required, upon the submission that he was complying and investigation was pending.

What did the court decide?

The condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed; the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required.

Palpandi Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Sixteenth day of March Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.2268 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1274 of 2017

¶6

PALPANDI ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶7

Vs THE STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAMPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT

¶8

CRIME NO.133 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1274 of 2017 dated 06/02/2017 on the file of this Honourable Court and thus render justice.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶11

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly from 08.02.2017 and the investigation is pending.

¶12

Taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed and the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required.

sd/-

16/03/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.

¶17

¶18

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, SRIVILLIPUTHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶19

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVILLIPUTHUR AT VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶20

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAMPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶21

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶22

AKV

¶23

CSL/RR/SAR-II/21.03.2017 : 2P/5C

¶24

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.2268 of 2017 IN

¶25

CRL OP(MD) No.1274 of 2017

¶26

Date :16/03/2017

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Palpandi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Palpandi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahman, Vs State Rep. by

Vijaya, Vs State Rep.by

Alagarsamy, Vs the State through

Michael Ammal Vs a.George

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Eswaran, Vs the Inspector of Police