4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are very many legal infirmities in the conviction recorded by the Trial Court and they are required to be revised. He further submitted that there is no proof or evidence on the side of the complainant to speak about the means in paying a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- on the date of issuing cheque by the petitioner herein. While the complainant was examined as P.W.1 before the Trail Court, he has admitted that on the date of issuance of cheque, he is not having Rs.10,00,000/- on hand. It is further submitted that there is no such averments in the complaint or in the statutory notice. The respondent has not chosen to prove the enforceable debt on the date of issuance of cheque by the respondent himself. He further submitted that the petitioner is having arguable points in this Criminal Revision and he is having a prima facie case in his favour.