Allowed

Kathirvel, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Dec 2017CRL MP(MD)/11308/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail matter arising from commitments under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC, the Madras High Court relaxed the strict condition requiring appearance only if summoned, allowing the petitioner to appear when required.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the condition imposed by the Court, directing the petitioner to appear before the concerned Court as and when required on receipt of summons.

Kathirvel, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.11308 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.15363 of 2017

¶6

KATHIRVEL ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER Vs

¶7

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARANKOIL TOWN POLICE STATION, CRIME NO.538/2017,

¶9

TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.O.P (MD).No.15363/2017 dated 10/11/2017.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P.T. THIRAVIAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.M.MURUGAN. Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶12

The Petitioner filed this petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 307 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.538 of 2017.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶14

3.The Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court for a period of 30 days.

¶15

4.Considering the above said facts, the condition is relaxed, and the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court as and when required, on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

sd/-

14/12/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶21

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARANKOIL TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. C.C. to Mr. P.T. THIRAVIAM Advocate SR.No.36334 JAM/19.12.17/PM-PN/ SAR 3/ 2P-6C

¶22

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.11308 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.15363 of 2017 Date :14/12/2017

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kathirvel, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kathirvel, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeswari Vs Mala @ Leelavathi

Jeyaraman Vs Nagajothi

Aslam @ Asil Muhammed, Vs the Inspector of Police

P. Sivasubramanian Vs Murugan

Mohamed Hanifa @ Thenkasi Vs the Additional Superintendent

T.Chidambaram Vs the Inspector of Police