Partly allowed

Ramachandran, S/O.Velandi, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC30 Nov 2017CRL MP(MD)/10885/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal original petition filed for relaxing the bail conditions imposed on petitioners accused under IPC 379 and the Mines and Minerals Act. The court, noting the petitioners' compliance for 11 weeks, relaxed the condition requiring regular appearance, directing them to appear only upon summons.

What did the court decide?

Condition of regular appearance before respondent police is relaxed; petitioners shall appear on receipt of summons.

Ramachandran, S/O.Velandi, Vs the Inspector… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.10885 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.11627 of 2017

¶6

1 RAMACHANDRAN

¶7

2 THIRUMURUGAN ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶8

¶9

STATE REP.BY ITS,

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶11

CRIME.NO.255 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD). No.11627/2017 dated 04/09/2017.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶14

The Petitioners filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 of I.P.C. r/w Section 21 (1) of Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act, in crime No.255 of 2017.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶16

3.The Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the

¶17

respondent Police submitted that the petitioners are regularly https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complying with the conditions imposed by this Court for a period of 11 weeks.

¶18

4.Considering the above said facts, the condition is relaxed, and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required, on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶19

sd/30/11/2017 / TRUE COPY /

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI

¶23

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶24

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶25

THIRUCHULI PÓLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶26

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶27

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.10885 of 2017 IN

¶29

CRL OP(MD) No.11627 of 2017 Date :30/11/2017 PK/PM-PN/SAR-4/06.12.2017 : 2P/5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ramachandran, S/O.Velandi, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramachandran, S/O.Velandi, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subbaiah @ Vijay Vs the Inspector of Police

Tamilarasi Vs the Inspector of Police

Veerachamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Sheik Jalil Vs the Inspector of Police

Karuppasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Krishnamoorthy, Vs the Inspector of Police