Partly allowed

Nagoor Meeran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Nov 2017CRL MP(MD)/10793/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court relaxed the bail conditions imposed in a prior anticipatory bail order. The petitioner is now required to appear only upon summons for interrogation regarding offences under Sections 294(b)/420/506(i) of IPC.

What did the court decide?

The conditions of anticipatory bail imposed on the petitioner are relaxed; he must appear before the police upon receipt of summons for interrogation.

Nagoor Meeran Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of November Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.10793 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.12305 of 2017

¶7

NAGOOR MEERAN

¶8

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶9

¶10

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY, IN CRIME NO. 649 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.O.P. (MD).No.12305 of 2017 dated 21.09.2017

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.SIVASUBRAMANIAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

The Petitioner filed this petition for relaxing the condition imposed by this Court for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 420, 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.649 of 2017, while granting anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶15

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly for a period https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of 43 days.

¶16

¶17

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered.

¶18

sd/-

¶19

28/11/2017 / TRUE COPY /

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶21

Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO I TIRUNELVELI

¶23

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶24

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY

¶25

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶26

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.10793 of 2017 IN

¶27

CRL OP(MD) No.12305 of 2017

¶28

Date :28/11/2017

¶29

mrn

¶30

SH/RR/SAR-1:06.12.2017:2P/5C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Nagoor Meeran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagoor Meeran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.N.Krishnakumar Vs R.Nakkeeran

Sekar Vs the Inspector of Police

Mani @ Paramadevar Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Esakkimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Senthil Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police