Sudharshan Venkatraman, v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought to modify bail conditions requiring daily reporting to CBI. dismissed .
What did the court decide?
Modification condition imposed on petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.9654 of 2017 dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S. BASKARAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.7609 of 2017
IN CRL OP.9654/2017
1 SUDHARSHAN VENKATRAMAN, [ PETITIONERS ] 2 RAMANUJAM SESHARATHINAM
Vs
THE STATE [ RESPONDENT ] REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, BS AND FC, BANGALORE, CR.NO.RC8 (E)/2016
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to To modify one of the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9654 of 2017, directing the petitioners to report before the Respondent CBI, Bangalore daily for a period of 2 weeks and thereafter shall appear before the trial court for all hearings without fail to any other condition and pass any such other or further orders as this Honble Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHARSHAN VENKATRAMAN
- petitioner
RAMANUJAM SESHARATHINAM
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court