Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Shanmugam, 49 Vs Senthilkumar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
Shanmugam, 49 Vs SenthilkumarShanmugam, 49 v. Senthilkumar

Disposed

Shanmugam, 49 v. Senthilkumar

Madras HC19 Jun 2017CRL MP/6741/2017

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Criminal…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Nineteenth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.6741 of 2017

IN CRL RC.712/2017

1 SHANMUGAM [ PETITIONER ]

2 SAMPATH

Vs

1 SENTHILKUMAR [ RESPONDENT ]

2 STATE REPRESENTED BY,

IS INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E1, MYLAPORE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 600 004.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
SHANMUGAM
petitioner
SAMPATH
respondent
SENTHILKUMAR
respondent
STATE

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 19 Jun 2017 · June
Registered: 1 Jun 2017
Case no.: CRL MP/6741/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V. Bharathidasan

I.Vaithiyanathan, Aged 49 Yrs, Vs S.Shanthi
16 Jun 2017
Murugan, Aged 57 Years, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer
16 Jun 2017
Manoj Kumar, M/A-30 Vs State Rep.by
16 Jun 2017
M.Suresh (34 Years) Vs G.Manian
19 Jun 2017

Cite this judgement

Shanmugam, 49 v. Senthilkumar, CRL MP/6741/2017 (MAD), decided on 19 June 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V. BHARATHIDASAN

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

CR.NO.2021 OF 2013.

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to dispense with the appearance of the petitioners herein in C.C.No.266 of 2017 on the file of the Learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, CRL.RC.NO.712 OF 2017 [IN CRL.MP.NO.6741 OF 2017]

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [FOR R-2] on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

The personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial court is dispensed with.

-sd/-

19/06/2017

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

TRUE COPY

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.XVII, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION]

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E1, MYLAPORE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 600 004.

+1C.C. to M/S.R.KARTHIKEYAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.10985

in CRL MP.6741/2017 in CRL RC.712/2017

Date :19/06/2017

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

MK:21/06/2017

V. BHARATHIDASAN

CNR

HCMA010992652017

Topic

Criminal Trial and Appeal

Bench

V. Bharathidasan

Disposal

ORDERED

M/S.Emayam Enterprises Vs Central Bank of India

19 Jun 2017

S.Sathish Kumar, Vs Mrs.Priya

19 Jun 2017