Allowed

C.Kaliappan, Aged 66 Years, v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC6 Apr 2017CRL MP/4585/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court relaxed the bail condition imposed on the petitioner to report before the Special Court for SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) on the first working day of every month, recognizing regular compliance with previous conditions.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed on the petitioner in M.P.No.2 of 2013 in Crl.A.No.671 of 2011 dated 22.07.2013 is fully relaxed.

C.Kaliappan, Aged 66 Years, Vs the State Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Sixth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon `ble Mr Justice T.MATHIVANAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4585 of 2017

¶7

IN CRL A.671/2011

¶8

C.KALIAPPAN [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

1 THE STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENTS ] THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBI & SCB, CHENNAI. CR.NO.RC/3/(S)/95

¶11

2 THE TAMIL NADU TRIBAL ASSOCIATION, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT P.SHANMUGAM

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the bail condition of reporting before the learned Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri (Special court for Schedule Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989) on the first working day of every month imposed by its order dated 22.07.2013 in M.P.No.2 of 2013 in Crl.A.No.671/2011.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.BHARATHIRAJA, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.B.MOHAN, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES on behalf of the Respondent-1, the court made the following order:-

¶14

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is reported by the learned Special Public Prosecutor that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions stipulated by this Court.

¶15

Recording the said submission, the condition imposed on the petitioner in M.P.No.2 of 2013 in Crl.A.No.671 of 2011 dated 22.07.2013 is fully relaxed.

¶16

-sd/-

¶17

06/04/2017

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶19

TRUE COPY

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶21

¶22

1 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARMAPURI(SPECIAL COURT FOR SC & ST(PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT 1989.

¶23

2 TAMIL NADU TRIBAL ASSIOTION REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT P.SHANMUGAM

¶24

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, SALEM. 4 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBI & SCB, CHENNAI.

¶25

5 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, FOR CBI CASES, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

6 THE SECTION OFFICER, CRIMINAL SECTION, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

C.C. to M/S.J.BHARATHIRAJA Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.20673

Order

in CRL MP.4585/2017

CRL A.671/2011

Date :06/04/2017

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶34

rvr 10/04/2017

C.Kaliappan, Aged 66 Years, v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Kaliappan, Aged 66 Years, v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Natarajan Vs N.M. Sivan

T.Ganaprakasam, (M/45) Vs State through

Elangovan Vs Sulochana

K.Pachaiappan, Aged 72 Years, Vs the State Rep. by

The Union Territory of Vs a.Rathinavathyammal

A.Panneer Selvam, M/a 61 Years Vs the State Rep by Its