Allowed

Baiju, Aged 37 Years, v. State by, the Forest Range

Madras HC23 Mar 2017CRL MP/3876/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court relaxed the condition of weekly reporting for the petitioner before the Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases, allowing monthly appearances until further orders, considering his health issues and compliance history. Adjourned on 23/03/2017.

What did the court decide?

The condition to appear before the Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases at 10.30 a.m. every week is relaxed to appear on the first working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m

Baiju, Aged 37 Years, Vs State by, the Forest Range — Madras HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3876 of 2017

IN CRL A.399/2016

BAIJU [ PETITIONER ]

STATE BY, THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, [ RESPONDENT ] VALPARAI RANGE, COIMBATORE DISTRICT. OR.NO.54 OF 2001.

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition to report before the learned Additional District Sessions Judge/Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases, Coimbatore on the first working day of every week at 10.30 a.m. as imposed in Para No.6 the order dated 26.07.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.6054 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.399 of 2016 on the file of this Honourable Court

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of MR.R.VINOTHRAJA Advocate for M/S.N.MANOKARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. K.MATHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶13

Heard both sides.

¶14

It is represented on behalf of the Petitioner / A.1 that he is abiding the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.6054 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.399 of 2016 dated 26.07.2016 without any default. This fact is not disputed on behalf of the Respondent / Prosecution.

¶15

Considering the fact that the Petitioner has some health problems and also he finds it difficult to appear on the first working day of every week at 10.30 a.m., before the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge / Special Judge for Essential Commodities Act Cases, Coimbatore and also this Court taking note of the fact that he is abiding the condition imposed by this Court dated 26.07.2016 in Crl.A.No.399 of 2016 without any default, directs the Petitioner /A.1 to appear before the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases, Coimbatore on the First Working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m. without fail until further orders.

¶16

Accordingly, this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered on the above terms.

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

23/03/2017

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

¶23

1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE/SPECIAL COURT FOR ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT CASES, COIMBATORE.

¶24

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶25

3 THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, VALPARAI RANGE, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

¶26

+1C.C. to M/S.N.MANOKARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.5581

Order

CRL MP.3876/2017

CRL A.399/2016

Date :23/03/2017

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶34

MK:28/03/2017

Baiju, Aged 37 Years, v. State by, the Forest Range

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baiju, Aged 37 Years, v. State by, the Forest Range

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopi @ Gopinath, Vs the State Rep. by Inspector

C.Kathirvel Vs M/S.K.S.v.Cotton Mills (P) Ltd.

The State Rep by Vs Solaimuthu

G.S.Gunasekar (M/35) Vs Vinayaga Trading Company

Mrs.K.Dhanabakkiyam, Vs Ms.Thirumala Wall Decors &

Gangatharan, Aged 60 Years, Vs P.S.Pushpalatha, Aged 55 Years