Allowed

Ganesh, (M/35 Years) v. State Rep.by

Madras HC20 Nov 2017CRL MP/14094/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The criminal miscellaneous petition was heard to extend time for furnishing sureties for the petitioner, who was already granted an extension in September 2017. The court satisfied with the reasons provided granted a final further extension of time for two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Time for furnishing sureties extended for a final period of two weeks from the date the order of extension is made ready.

Ganesh, (M/35 Years) Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twentieth day of November Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. N. PRAKASH

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.14094 of 2017

¶7

IN CRL OP.17721/2017

¶8

1 GANESH,

¶9

[ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED]

¶10

2 THANGALAKSHMI 3 M.JEYAKODI

¶11

4 J.JANAKI

¶12

¶13

STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C2 RACE COURSE POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE-641 018. CR.NO.1028 OF 2017.

¶14

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to extend the time for furnishing sureties in Crl.OP.No.17721 of 2017 dated 01/09/2017.

¶15

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.RAVINDHAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.MADHAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶16

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent.

¶17

2. This Court has perused the petition and satisfied with the reasons stated therein.

¶18

3. Time granted by this Court on 01.09.2017 in Crl.O.P.No.17721 of 2017 to furnish sureties shall stand further extended for a period of two weeks finally from the date on which,

¶19

the copy of the order is made ready. No further extension will be granted.

¶20

-sd/20/11/2017

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.VII, EGMORE, CHENNAI

¶26

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C2 RACE COURSE POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE-641 018.

¶29

C.C. to M/S.M.RAVINDHAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

in CRL MP.14094/2017

CRL OP.17721/2017

Date :20/11/2017

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format ths : 24.11.2017

Ganesh, (M/35 Years) v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh, (M/35 Years) v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Mangaiyarkarasi Vs Suresh Chandra Chogmalji Bafna

Murthy Vs Sub Inspector Ofp Olice

Sri Anuman-a-Dyeing Vs Ragava-a-Process by Its Partne

M/S.Jai Enterprises Vs S.Salim

M/S.Pechiamman Agency Vs Raja Sathish T.Kumar

K.Ragupathy Vs J.Naziera Begum