Selvaraj, M/A-59 Years, v. the State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court modified an anticipatory bail condition granted on 24.08.2017. It changed the requirement for a parent to be a surety to a condition requiring the petitioner's wife to be a surety, as the petitioner's parents are deceased.
What did the court decide?
Condition imposed in Crl.O.P. No. 15918 of 2017 modified to require petitioner's wife as one surety instead of a parent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. N. PRAKASH
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13529 of 2017
IN CRL OP.15918/2017
SELVARAJ
[ PETITIONER ]
Vs
THE STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDUMALPET POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.481 OF 2015
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to modify condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crime No.481 of 2015 in Crl.O.P. No.15918 of 2017 dated on 24.08.2017
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condition requiring a parent to be a surety for anticipatory bail can be modified when both parents are deceased.
Whether the trial court was correct in granting such a modification.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SELVARAJ
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
P. N. PRAKASH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court