Seenivasan v. the Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal filed to modify bail conditions No.2 and No.3 imposed by the Sessions Judge. The Court modified Condition No.2 to stay in Virudhunagar and appear daily at Srivilliputhur instead of Thiruvallur. Condition No.3 remains unaltered.
What did the court decide?
Condition No.2 modified to stay at Virudhunagar and appear daily at Principal Sessions Judge, Srivilliputhur.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.12.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BASHEER AHAMED
Crl.A.(MD)No.483 of 2017
1.Seenivasan
2.Sudalaikannu 3.Subbiah
... Petitioners
Vs.
The State, Rep.by Sub Inspector of Police, Thattarmadam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
(Crime No.118 of 2017). ... Respondent
PRAYER: The Petition filed under Section 14-A (2) of the SC & ST (POA) Act, 1989 as amended by Act 1 of 2016 to allow this Criminal Appeal in so far as condition Nos.2 & 3 are concerned made in Crl.M.P.No.3075 of 2017 dated 04.11.2017 passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli and set aside the same.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail conditions imposed regarding daily appearance at Thiruvallur and prohibition on entering Thoothukudi district should be modified.
Whether to modify the condition to stay at Virudhunagar and appear daily at Srivilliputhur.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Seenivasan
- petitioner
Sudalaikannu
- respondent
The State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court