N.Vasudevan v. Senthilkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal filed by the Appellant under Section 378 CrPC was allowed to be withdrawn by the Appellant, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.03.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL
Crl.A.No. 159 of 2015
N.Vasudevan ... Appellant / Complainant Vs. Senthilkumar ... Respondent / Accused PRAYER: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the Judgment in C.A.No.5 of 2014 dated 11.02.2015 on the file of the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore and restore the Judgment of the Learned Fast Track Court No.2, Magisterial Level Coimbatore in C.C.No.18 of 2012 dated 12.12.2013.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.Aranganathan J U D G M E N T
The Learned Counsel for the Appellant has made an endorsement in the Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal to the effect that 'the Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the Criminal Appeal'. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssd
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N. Vasudevan
- respondent
Senthilkumar
Coram
M. Venugopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court