Disposed
S.Krishnan, v. Mr.Senthil Kumar
Madras HCCONT P(MD)/710/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner sought punishment for the respondents for willful disobedience of an order dated 04.01.2016. The Government Advocate stated that a case was registered pursuant to the order. Recording this submission, the court closed the petition without imposing costs.
What did the court decide?
The petition was closed upon satisfaction that the impugned order had been complied with by registering the case.