R.Ramuammal v. a.E.Prabhu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew contempt petition as admitted compliance with previous order was represented by both sides. Case closed without adjudication.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVICHANDRABAABU
Contempt Petition No.924 of 2016
R.Ramuammal .. Petitioner vs. Mr.A.E.Prabhu Assistant Engineer(O&M) TANGEDCO, Muthupettai, Thiruvarur District. ... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26871 of 2014 dated 07.09.2015. For Petitioner : Ms.P.T.Ramadevi For Respondent : Mr.P.Gunaraj O R D E R
Both sides represented that the order passed in the
writ petition has been complied with. Therefore, the contempt Petition is closed.
SD/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(OS-I) vsi
//Certified to be true copy//
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Ramuammal
- respondent
Mr.A.E.Prabhu
Coram
RAVICHANDRABAABU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court