Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought punishment under Section 11 for disobedience of a 2014 order. The court found the prior order had been complied with and closed the contempt petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.08.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.No.853 of 2016
R.Selvaraj,
S/o.Radhakrishnan,
Forest guard,
Karamadai Forest Range,
Coimbatore Division and Circle. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Thiru Hans Raj Vaerma, I.A.S.,
Rep.by its Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Forest and Environment Department,
Secretariat,
Chennai 600 009.
2.Mr.N.Krishnakumar, I.F.S.,
Principal Chief Conservator of Forest,
Panagal Maaligai,
Saidapet,
Chennai 600 015.
3.Mr.Senthil Kumar I.F.S.,
The District Forest Officer,
Coimbatore.
4.Ms.Snehalatha I.A.S.,
The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu,
Office at DMS Compound,
Teynampet,
Chennai 600 018. ... Respondents
2
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 21.08.2014, passed by this Court in W.P.No.22544 of 2014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Selvaraj
- respondent
Hans Raj Vaerma
Coram
V.PARTHIBAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court