S.Sandanam v. Dr.M.Devadoss
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act was disposed of as the challenged order was found to have been complied with; petition stands closed, no order on costs.
What did the court decide?
No order passed; no order on costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.11.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
CONT. P No.3378 of 2014
S.Sandanam
... Petitioner
Vs
Dr.Thiru.M.Devadoss,
Director of Collegiate Education,
College road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai-600 006. ... Respondents
PRAYER: The Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of
Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondent for his
disobedience to court, justice and judicial system,
especially the order of this Court made in WP.No.8007/2014
dated 25.07.2014.
For Petitioner : A.Amalraj
For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhananjayan, Spl GP
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent states that an order passed by this Court on 25.07.2014 in W.P.No.8007 of 2014 has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Sandanam
- respondent
Dr.Thiru.M.Devadoss
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court