N.Arulmojy v. B.Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras closed a Contempt Petition filed for punishment of respondents for alleged wilful disobedience of an order. The court recorded that the department had released goods as directed and disposed of the matter.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition stood closed after recording respondent's submission regarding release of goods.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.03.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.298 of 2017
N.Arulmojy ...Petitioner
Vs
1.Shri.B.Kannan,
Commissioner of Customs (Appeal),
No.60, Rajaji Salai, Customs House,
Chennai – 600 001.
2.Shri.Jag Ram Meera,
Assistant Commissioner of Customs
(Adjudication-AIR),
New Customs House, Meenambakkam,
Chennai – 600 027. ...Respondents
PETITION filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts
Act praying to punish the respondents for their wilful
disobedience of the order of this Court dated 23.09.2016
made in W.P.No.33448 of 2015.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar
Standing Counsel(Customs)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Arulmojy
- respondent
Shri.B.Kannan
- respondent
Shri.Jag Ram Meera
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court