Govindaraju v. Mr.N.Ravi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court observed that a compliance report confirmed adherence to a prior order. The Contempt Petition was closed with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Petition is closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.10.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Cont.P.No.2977 of 2016
Govindaraju ... Petitioner
Vs
1. Mr.N.Ravi,
The Head Master,
Government Deaf School,
Srinivasa Colony,
Suramangalam, Salem.
2. Mr.Murugaiyan, I.A.S.,
The State Commissioner,
Office of the State Commissioner
for the Differently Abled,
S.R.T.C. Campus,
K.K.Nagar, Chennai – 78. ... Respondents
Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for
having defied the order of this Court dated 03.09.2014 made
in W.P.No.23788 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Jeeva Giridharan
For Respondents : Mr.M.Perumal Government Advocate
O R D E R
The learned Government Advocate filed a compliance report signed by the second respondent, State Commissioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ for the Differently Abled, K.K.Nagar, Chennai – 600 078.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Govindaraju
- respondent
Mr.N.Ravi
- respondent
Mr.Murugaiyan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court