The High Court of Madras disposed of a Contempt Petition filed against the Commissioner of Social Welfare for disobeyaing a prior order regarding seniority in compassionate appointment. The Court closed the petition and granted liberty to file a fresh one.
Contempt Petition closed; liberty granted to file fresh petition if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.06.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CONTEMPT PETITION No.235 of 2017
R.Senthil Kumar ... PETITIONER Vs Mr.Savio Cristo Nayagam, Commissioner of Social Welfare, Department of Social Welfare, Chepauk, Chennai-5. ... RESPONDENT Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1960 praying to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in W.P.No.39008 of 2015, dated 11.12.2015 and being mentioned on 19.10.2016.
For Petitioner : Ms.M.D.Leelavathi
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai
Government Advocate
O R D E R
This petition is filed seeking to punish the respondent
for committing contempt of court by disobeying the order dated 11.12.2015 in W.P.No.39008 of 2015.
that the petitioner is in seniority No.4 and whenever vacancy https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
arises for consideration under compassionate appointment, the
2
petitioner's case will be considered.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be punished for contempt for disobeying the order dated 11.12.2015 in W.P.No.39008 of 2015.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Senthil Kumar
Mr.Savio Cristo Nayagam
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
