R.Rajagopalan v. Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for disobedience of a court order. Respondent undertook to settle dues. High Court observed no further adjudication is needed and closed the petition without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.11.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.172 of 2015
R.Rajagopalan
..Petitioner
Vs.
Tmt.Sabitha,
Secretary,
Education Department,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
...Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for
Contempt for willfully disobeying the order dated
21.12.2012 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.34561 of
2012.
For Petitioner : M/s.A.Bobblie For Respondent : Mr.M.Perumal Government Advocate O R D E R
Government Advocate
The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf
of the respondent states that pursuant to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court passed an order in Review Application No.227 of 2015 in W.A.No.352 of 2014 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Rajagopalan
- respondent
Tmt.Sabitha
Coram
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court