R.Govindan v. Rajaram
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner argued that the impugned order has been complied with. Consequently, the learned Single Judge closed the Contempt Petition No.1189 of 2017 without recording detailed facts or reasons found in the text.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed as compliance with the previous order is established.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.07.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Cont.P.No.1189 of 2017
R.Govindan ... Petitioner
Vs.
Rajaram,
General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd.,
Kancheepuram Region,
Kancheepuram. ... Respondent
Prayer : The Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for having disobeyed the orders of this hon'ble Court in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in W.P.No.1733 of 2015 dated 17.02.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sundaramurthy For Respondent : Mr.P.Paramasivadoss
2
T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Govindan
- respondent
Rajaram
Coram
T.S. Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court