Petitioner filed contempt petition for wilful disobedience of an order directing a fresh enquiry. Court found final order passed on 30.10.2013 was based on fresh enquiry with opportunity afforded. Held order complied. Dismissed.
Contempt Petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :02.11.2017
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.1157 of 2014
L.Natarajan
S/o Lakshmanan
No.5/7, Kurinji nagar,
Kuniyamuthur Post,
Coimbatore- 641 008.
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.M.Chandrasekaran
Chairman and Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.,
No.42, Thambu Sami Road, Kilpauk,
Chennai - 600 010.
2.P.Babu,
The Senior Regional Manager,(In Charge)
Coimbatore Region,
Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.,
Coimbatore - 641 030.
... Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for having wilful disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.25251 of 2008 pronounced on 14.03.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gokulraj For Respondent : Mr.C.Munusamy
2
O R D E R
The Contempt Petition has been filed against the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.25251 of 2008 dated 14.03.2013 where in this Court directed the respondents as
under:-
" Accordingly, the impugned orders are set aside and the petition is allowed remitting the matter back to the second respondent to conduct fresh enquiry only with the key witnesses and an opportunity of hearing to be afforded to the petitioner and such an exercise should be completed within five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.”
the enquiry proceedings were again taken up by the disciplinary authority and the final order was passed by the disciplinary authority 30.10.2013, it is further clarified that a fresh enquiry was conducted by the respondents by giving opportunity to the petitioner.
3.Thus, this Court is of the opinion that the order https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ passed by this Court in W.P.No.25251 of 2008 dated
3
14.03.2013, has been complied with. Thus, no further adjudication is required and if any grievance exist, the writ petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the
manner known to law.
4.Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed.
SD/-
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(OS-I)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2017.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
KR/CO/28/11/2017
To
1.Mr.M.Chandrasekaran
Chairman and Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.,
No.42, Thambu Sami Road, Kilpauk,
Chennai - 600 010.
2.P.Babu,
The Senior Regional Manager,(In Charge)
Coimbatore Region,
Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.,
Coimbatore - 641 030.
one cc to M/s.C.Munusamu, Advocate, sr.NO.12705/17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents complied with the direction to conduct a fresh enquiry with opportunity of hearing given in W.P.No.25251 of 2008.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
L.Natarajan
M.Chandrasekaran
P.Babu
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
