The Special Tahsildar (La) v. Mr.Karuppiah Nadar (Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirteenth day of February Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.S.SUNDAR
CMP(MD)Nos.976 to 978 of 2017 IN AS No.483 of 1998 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE, VIRUDHUNAGAR ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS. - Vs. - KARUPPIAH NADAR (DIED) 1 K.MARIAPPAN 2 K.KARUPPASAMY (DIED) 3 K.SHANMUGA GANI 4 K.BALASUBRAMANIAN 5 K.PANCHAVARNAM (DIED) 6 G.LINGAMMAL 7 K.ARUMUGATHAI 8 S.VIJAYALAKSHMI ...RESPONDENTS 1 TO 8/ PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 1 TO 8 IN ALL THE PETITIONS. 9 K.PARAMESWARI 10 PERIYASAMY 11 BHUVANESWARI 12 SUDHA GANESH ...RESPONDENTS 9 TO 12/ PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 9 TO 12 (LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED 2ND RESPONDENT) IN ALL THE PETITIONS. 13 MUNEESWARI 14 ANANDEESWARI 15 RAJESWARAN 16 DHANALAKSHMI 17 KATHIRVELPANDIAN ...RESPONDENTS 13 TO 17/ PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 13 TO 17(LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF 5TH RESPONDENT K.PANCHAVARNAM) IN ALL THE PETITIONS. Prayer in CMP(MD). 976/ 2017 :
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 1820 days to bring on the record of the proposed respondents 13 to 17 herein in A.S.No.483 of 1998 as Legal https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Representatives of the deceased 5th respondent namely K.Panchavarnam.
2
Prayer in CMP(MD). 977/ 2017 :
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to set aside the abatement in bring on record of the proposed respondents 13 to 17 herein in A.S.No.483 of 1998 as Legal Representatives of the deceased 5th respondent namely K.Panchavarnam.
Prayer in CMP(MD). 978/ 2017 :
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to bring on record of the proposed respondents 13 to 17 herein in A.S.No.483 of 1998 as Legal Representatives of the deceased 5th respondent namely K.Panchavarnam.
ORDER:These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.KUMAR, Additional Government Pleader, for the petitioner in all the petitions and of MR.D.SAKKARAVARTHI, Advocate, on behalf of the Respondents in all the petitions, the court made the following order:-
These petitions are filed to condone the delay of 1820 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased 5th respondent, to set aside the abatement and to bring on record the proposed respondents 13 to 17 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased 5th respondent.
2.Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
THE PRINCIPAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, SRIVILLIPUTHUR. ORDER
IN
CMP(MD)Nos.976 to 978 of 2017 IN
AS No.483 of 1998
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :13/02/2017 AM/PM PN/SAR-3/15.02.2017/2P/2C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the huge delay of 1820 days in bringing legal representatives of a deceased respondent on record is condonable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE, VIRUDHUNAGAR
K.BALASUBRAMANIAN
K.PANCHAVARNAM (DECEASED)
K.PARAMESWARI
PERIYASAMY
MUNEESWARI
S.S.SUNDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court