Dismissed

G. Uma Maheswari v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC20 Jul 2017CMP(MD)/3331/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed an interim application filed by an Assistant Professor seeking a direction to keep a vacancy of her subject pending disposal of a related writ petition concerning recruitment benefits. The Court found no reason to grant the interim relief prayed for.

What did the court decide?

Interim direction keeping a post vacant for the petitioner was refused and the petition was dismissed.

G. Uma Maheswari Vs the Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Twentieth day of July Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Honble Mr.Justice K.K.SASIDHARAN and The Honble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CMP(MD) No.3331 of 2017 IN WA(MD) No.339 of 2017

¶6

G. UMA MAHESWARI ... PETITIONER / APPELLANT

¶7

¶8

1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION (F2) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF TN, FORT ST.GEORGE,

¶9

CHENNAI-09.

¶10

2 THE MEMBER SECRETARY

¶11

TEACHERS RECRUITMENT BOARD, CHENNAI-06. ... RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant an order of INTERIM DIRECTION directing the Respondents to keep one post of Assistant Professor (Zoology) in anyone of the Government Arts&Science Colleges, Thanjavur vacant for the petitioner, pending disposal of the above WA(MD) 339/2017.

¶13

PRAYER IN WA(MD)No.339 of 2017:-

¶14

to set aside the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP(MD) No.2145/16 dated 11.08.2016 and to pass such further or other order/s as this Hon'ble Court.

¶15

Prayer in WP(MD). 2145/ 2016 :

¶16

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to award 15 marks for the petitioner for the experience of the petitioner in the light of the notification of the 2nd respondent in Advertisement No.4/2013 dated 28.5.2013 and as per the orders in WP(MD)No.2274 & 2275 of 2014 dated 11.2.2014 and G.O.ms.No.502 of the 1st respondent dated 31.12.2015 and consequently direct the petitioners to appoint the petitioner as Assistant Professor in Zoology in any one of the government colleges with all monetary and attendance benefits on par with other eligible candidates.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the

¶19

petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.G.SANKARAN, Advocate for the petitioner , while admitting the WA., the court made the following order:-

¶20

We do not find any reason to grant interim directing as prayed for by the petition. Hence, this petition is dismissed.

¶21

sd/20/07/2017

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

¶25

1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION (F2) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF TN, FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI-09.

¶26

2 THE MEMBER SECRETARY TEACHERS RECRUITMENT BOARD, CHENNAI-06.

¶27

JAM/25.07.17/CM-MSA/SAR 2/ 2p-3c

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G. Uma Maheswari v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Uma Maheswari v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Competent Authority Vs K.L.K.and K.R.S.

The Secretary to Government Vs a.Murugesan

The Secretary to Government Vs K.Velammal

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs the Manager/Correspondent

N. Gunasekeran Vs the Bharat Heavy Electricals

N. Bavani Vs the Commissionr and Secretary