Dismissed

P. Raja v. K. Venkateshan

Madras HC20 Apr 2017CMP(MD)/1369/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Supreme Court of India (Madurai Bench) dismissed a miscellaneous petition and writ appeal. The petitioner, a third party, sought leave to file a Writ Appeal against an order in a Writ Petition filed by the appointee. The Court held that since the petitioner had not directly challenged the appointment order, he could not indirectly challenge it via an appeal in the appointee's petition and must pur

What did the court decide?

Miscellaneous Petition and Writ Appeal are dismissed and rejected. No costs.

P. Raja Vs K. Venkateshan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 20.04.2017

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN C.M.P.(MD).No.1369 of 2017 IN W.A.[MD].(SR)No.5731 of 2017

P.Raja : Petitioner

Vs.

1.K.Venkateshan,

2.The Secretary, Department of School Education, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat,

¶10

Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

¶11

3.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-6.

¶12

4.The District Educational Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

¶13

5.The Secretary, Swamy Viveganantha Vidyalayam Higher Secondary School, Vaichettipalayam-621 012, Trichy District. : Respondents/Respondents

¶14

Prayer in M.P(MD)No.1369 of 2017:- Petition filed under Section 151 of CPC, to grant leave to file Writ Appeal to the petitioner as against the order dated 10.01.2017 made in W.P(MD).No.450 of 2017.

¶15

Prayer in W.A(MD)SR.No.5731 of 2017:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 10.01.2017 made in W.P(MD).No.450 of 2017, on the file of this Court.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Manimaran For Respondent No.1 & 5 : Mr.B.Saravanan For Respondent No.2,3 & 4 : Mr.V.Muruganantham, Additional Government Pleader.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

¶22

Heard Mr.R.Manimaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.B.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 5 and Mr.V.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2, 3, and 4.

¶23

This application has been filed by a third party seeking Leave to file Writ Appeal against the order dated 10.01.2017 made in W.P.(MD).No.450 of 2017, which was filed by the first respondent herein.

¶24

3.The contention of the petitioner is that he is entitled to be promoted to the post of either Library Clerk or Junior Assistant in the fifth respondent school and it appears that the management gave an assurance to him that they will consider him to the post of Library Clerk and consequently, the vacancy in the post of Junior Assistant was filled up by another candidate. Subsequently, the management recruited the first respondent herein as Library Clerk by resorting to direct recruitment. The petitioner has challenged the appointment of the Junior Assistant by filing a separate Writ Petition and the same is pending. Now, the petitioner seeks Leave to file Writ Appeal against the order passed in the Writ Petition filed by the first respondent herein, seeking to set aside the order dated 15.10.2015, passed by the fourth respondent herein, rejecting the approval sought for by the management with regard to the appointment of the first respondent.

¶25

In our considered view, as long as the petitioner has not challenged the order of appointment of the first respondent, dated 07.01.2015, now, he cannot seek Leave to challenge the order passed in the Writ Petition filed by him, which would amount to indirectly challenging the order of appointment, which was made in the year 2015. Therefore, the petitioner has to pursue his remedy in the pending Writ Petition, wherein he has challenged the appointment to the post of Junior Assistant. Thus, the present Miscellaneous Petition seeking Leave stands dismissed. Consequently, W.A.[MD].(SR)No.5731 of 2017 is rejected. No costs.

¶26

Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-II)

¶27

/TRUE COPY/

¶28

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

¶31

To
1.The Secretary, Department of School Education, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-6.
3.The District Educational Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.
+1 CC TO MR.R.MANIMARAN,ADVOCATE,SR NO.53634
+1 CC TO MR.B.SARAVANAN,ADVOCATE,SR NO.53490
NB/MYR
MAS/MR:04.05.2017:3P-6C
ORDER M.P.(MD).No.1369 W.A.[MD].(SR)No.5731 20	MADE IN of 2017 IN of 2017 .04.2017

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Raja v. K. Venkateshan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Raja v. K. Venkateshan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumathi Vs M/S.National Insurance Com.

Murugesan Vs the Managing Director

The Director of Elementary Vs David Primary School

The Director General of Vs a. Arul Amalanathan

V.Kaliappan, Vs S.Murugam

S.Natchathiram, Hc 1640, Vs the Commissioner of Police