Dismissed

R.Mohan (Senior Citizen) v. the Commercial Deputy Manager

Madras HC8 Jun 2017CMP(MD)/12037/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ appeal and a connected miscellaneous petition filed by R.MohAN. The Court noted the party appeared in person but failed to file a caveat or affidavit as directed, resulting in dismissal.

What did the court decide?

The appeal/petition was dismissed as the party-in-person failed to comply with the direction to file a caveat/affidavit.

R.Mohan (Senior Citizen) Vs the Commercial… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Thursday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand and Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Honble Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honble Mr.Justice P.VELMURUGAN

¶6

CMP(MD) No.12037 of 2016 IN

¶7

WA(MD) No.SR17195 of 2016

¶8

R.MOHAN ... APPELLANT/PETITIONER

¶9

¶10

1 THE COMMERCIAL DEPUTY MANAGER,

¶11

SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI BRANCH, TRICHY RAILWAY STATION, TRICHY.

¶12

2 THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR, RAILWAY CLAIM TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI), FRESH FORD No.50,

¶13

M.C.NICHOLS ROD, CHETPET,

¶14

CHENNAI. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶15

Prayer in CMP(MD) No.12037 of 2016:

¶16

Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying this Court to Condone the delay of 89 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order made in W.P.(MD)NO.4170 of 2016 dated 01/03/2016 passed by this Honouable Court.

¶17

Prayer in WA(MD) No.SR17195 of 2016:

¶18

Appeal preferring under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the order of this Court dated 01.03.2016 made in WP(MD) No.4170 of 2016.

¶19

Prayer in WP(MD)No.4170/2016 :

¶20

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records pertaining in Dairy No.397/2013 dated 30.12.2013 passed by 2nd respondent and quash the same, consequently directing the 2nd respondent to take into file.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER: This Petition having been posted for orders on this day, for not having represented the batta with petition alongwith affidavit in the presence of Mr.R.MOHAN, Party-in-person and this court having

¶22

¶23

granted time on or before 22.06.2017 as condition precedent and the said party in person, not having complied with the said direction of this Court, it is ordered that this Appeal/Petition do stand dismissed against the respondents.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

/True Copy/

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

1 THE COMMERCIAL DEPUTY MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI BRANCH, TRICHY RAILWAY STATION, TRICHY.

¶30

2 THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR, RAILWAY CLAIM TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI), FRESH FORD No.50, M.C.NICHOLS ROD, CHETPET, CHENNAI.

¶31

DATED : 08.06.2017 ORDER

¶32

CMP(MD) No.12037 of 2016 IN WA(MD) No.SR17195 of 2016

¶33

Giving direction and etc., as stated within.

¶34

TE/SV-MMS/SAR-4 : 12/01/2018 : 2P/3C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Mohan (Senior Citizen) v. the Commercial Deputy Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Mohan (Senior Citizen) v. the Commercial Deputy Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.P.Rajeshwari Vs K.S.Radhakrishnan

Jansirani Vs P. Velkumar

The State of Tamil Nadu, Vs P.Raju (Retired Hc 692)

The Branch Manager Vs Anitha, W/O.Manikandan

Muthulaxmi @ Muthaparanam, Vs Gnana Sironmoni

The Government of Tamilnadu, Vs P.Ruth Boomiga Mary