The High Court dismissed two civil miscellaneous appeals as infructuous after the appellant's counsel submitted that nothing remained for adjudication.
Dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.10.2017
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
CMA.Nos.2292 & 2293 of 2002 and CMP.Nos.16493 to 16495 of 2002
K.Hariharan .. Appellant in both CMAs
Vs.
1.Jayalakshmi
2.Kathirvelu .. Respondents in both CMAs
Prayer in CMA.No.2292 of 2002 : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under Order 43 Rule 1(r) C.P.C., against the order and decretal order of the learned IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Madras against the common order dated 01.04.2002, passed in I.A.Nos.832/2002 in O.S.No.335/2002 in dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner herein under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C., 1908.
Prayer in CMA.No.2293 of 2002 : Civil Miscellaneous Appeals preferred under Order 43 Rule 1(r) C.P.C., against the order and decretal order of the learned IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Madras against the common order dated 01.04.2002, passed in I.A.Nos.2521/2002 in O.S.No.335/2002 in allowing the petition filed by the respondents herein under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC., to vacate the ad-interim injuction granted in I.A.No.833/2002, filed by the petitioner herein under XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C., 1908.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Karunakaran (in both CMAs)
2
N.SESHASAYEE,J
ds
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that nothing survives for adjudication in these appeals and hence they may be dismissed as infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect in the case
bundles.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel
for the appellant, these appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
06.10.2017
ds
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
To:
C.M.A.Nos.2292 & 2293 of 2002
K.Hariharan
Jayalakshmi
Kathirvelu
N.Seshasayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
