R.Dhavamani v. 1.AYYAVU
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.10.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
C.M.A.NPD.No.234 of 2002
and
C.M.P.Nos.2455 and 2456 of 2007
R.Dhavamani .. Appellant/2nd RESPONDENT Vs. 1. Ayyavu 2. Balammal 3. Robert 4. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office, Ootacaamund, Nilgiris. .. 1 & 2 Respondents/ CLAIMANTS R3 & R4/ 1st & 3rd RESPONDENTS Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 1.11.2001 passed in M.C.O.P.No.9 of 2000 on the file of the learned District Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, The Nilgiris at Ootacamund. For Appellant : No Appearance For 1st Respondent : Died For 2nd Respondent : Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan For 3rd Respondent : Batta Due For 4th Respondent : Mr.S.Arun Kumar
JUDGMENT
When the case was listed on 20.10.2017, there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, the matter was posted today under the caption ''for dismissal''. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Dhavamani
- respondent
Ayyavu
- respondent
Balammal
- respondent
Robert
- respondent
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court