Dismissed

Rose Daleema Thangam, v. Justin

Madras HC19 Jun 2017CMA(MD)/403/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal and related matters, confirming the judgment and decree of the Intermediate Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, in proceedings regarding AS.83 of 2012.

What did the court decide?

Judgment and decree passed by the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, dated 15.04.2014, made in AS.83 of 2012, be confirmed.

Rose Daleema Thangam, Vs Justin — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

¶3

Monday, the Nineteenth Day of June, Two Thousand and Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

C.M.A(MD)No.403 of 2015

¶7

and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015

¶8

and C.M.P(MD)No.12488 of 2016

¶9

Rose Daleema Thangam

¶10

.. Appellant/Respondent/ Defendant /vs/

¶11

1.Justin

¶12

2.G.Sheeja

¶13

(The respondents are represented by their Power-Holder Mr.Devadhas.) ...Respondents/Appellants/

¶14

...Respondents/Appellants/ Plaintiffs

¶15

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.83 of 2012, dated 15.4.2014, on the file of I Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil reversing the judgement and decree made in O.S.No.357 of 2010, dated 27.6.2012, on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram.

¶16

DECREE: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is coming on for hearing on this day and upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the order of the Lower Court and the material papers in this Appeal and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.S.Ramakrishnan, Advocate for the Appellant herein and of Mr.G.Ramanathan, Advocate for the respondents, this Court while dismissing this appeal, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶17

1.That the Judgment and decree passed by the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, dated 15.04.2014, made in AS.83 of 2012, be and hereby is confirmed and the civil miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed.

¶18

2.The parties be and hereby are directed to appear before the trial Court namely the Principal District Munsif Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Padmanabhapuram on 19.07.2017.

¶19

¶20

3.That there be and hereby no costs in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar /True copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

¶24

1.The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil.

¶25

2.The Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram.

¶26

Copy to: The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶27

+1cc to M/s.S.Ramakrishnan,Advocate,SR.60813 +1cc to Mr.G.Ramanathan,Advocate,SR.61120

¶28

ORDER DATED:19/06/2017

¶29

DECREE

¶30

C.M.A(MD)No.403 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 and

¶31

C.M.P(MD)No.12488 of 2016 Dismissing the Appeal preferred against the Judgment and decree of Ist Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, dated 15.04.2014, made in A.S.83 of 2012

¶32

KK/SKN RSK/SAR1/06.07.2017/2P-6C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rose Daleema Thangam, v. Justin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rose Daleema Thangam, v. Justin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director Vs S. Ramu

Siva, W/O. Mallikarjuna, Vs the District Collector

S.Drady Kingsly Vs the Tahsildar

The Managing Director, Vs Paramasivam

Nirmal Prabhu Doss Vs Shirley Johannah

P.V. Sowparnika Vs M. Viswanth