The appellant sought permission to withdraw a civil miscellaneous appeal filed under Section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, claiming the matter was settled. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and the connected petition concurrently.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21.06.2017
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.M.A(MD)No.356 of 2017
and
C.M.P(MD)No.4987 of 2017
Anthony Lyda .. Appellant/Respondent
-Vs-
Albert Lourduraj .. Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, against the order and decree made in I.D.O.P.No.66 of 2014, dated 29.2.2016, on the file of II Additional District Court at Trichy.
For Respondent : M/s.S.Muthukrishnan
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and has made the following endorsement:
''I withdraw this appeal on the instructions of appellant, as the matter was settled.''
2.In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
VSN
VB/MR-KKR/SAR4/06.07.2017/1P/3C
C.M.A(MD)No.356 of 2016 and C.M.P(MD)No.4987 of 2016 21.06.2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anthony Lyda
Albert Lourduraj
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
